Table of Contents
I 'd include Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is someplace in the leading three however with those domestics you certainly have my leading 4 of perpetuity for dependability. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine issue. Corrosion is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I question how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time getting out of it's very own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do whatever I need this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 points in the auto globe refuse to break.
those must be held as the benchmark to which everything else is determined. Nearly everything else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, due to the outpour of appreciation, it looked great so I got it, right here's the advertisement lmk what you guys think Oops, didn't suggest to be puzzling, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz however, I'm fairly large, and the steering wheel to seat is fairly narrow ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only issue I've ever before seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little as well tough and they would break right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage won't be the finest in the world, yet it will certainly damn sure run permanently. Never ever had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 highway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time obtaining out of it's very own method ... The engine bay wasn't made for anything longer than a Mod motor. One container get rid of an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, but it draws. Mod electric motors require ahead out sidewards and you need to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unlock like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill composed: In reply to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he say to require this? I'm truly curious. I didn't see anything in his reply that would need this action. "They are normally trusted as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones composed: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel. I ask yourself how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't explain ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that had not been sludged up really severely.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to chat regarding a couple of concerns of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same car.
They seem to be a little much more utilized because location, yet, you understand, those are a few of the uses, yet they're basically the same group of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. What concerns do you see in between these 2 vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's speak about engine and really simply to define that the design years, we're mosting likely to begin with 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long period of time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you recognize, around that time as well. We're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier things. Because 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot extra prominent and I wouldn't actually recommend a V6 engine.
You recognize, Fords, and most of them come with the Triton V8. There's a great deal of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with blow to these engines, since they really did not have adequate threading in the ignition system, which created problems. And often that would certainly occur when you may be in a 15 passenger bus rising a hillside with a tons of people and all of an abrupt boom, a spark plug pops out and you're stranded.
Extremely extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I had to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that had not been sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to speak regarding a couple of issues of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to appear and say one is much better than the other. So if that's what you're trying to find, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the distinctions between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. Allow's talk about engine and actually just to define that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I suggest, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a version of a Chevy van has been around because, you understand, around that time too. Considering that 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, because they didn't have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealer
Get This Report about Plumbing
